Options Corner: KeyCorp Got Caught In The Regional Bank Credit Scare But The Quants Still Love It

While regional banks like KeyCorp (NYSE:KEY) enjoyed a strong outing during the spring and summer seasons, sentiment started to wane just prior to fall. More recently, KEY stock got caught out amid the wave of volatility that struck the financial subsector. Notably, the SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (NYSE:KRE) logged its worst single-day performance since April 4, when President Donald Trump announced sweeping Liberation Day tariffs.

Still, amid the wreckage — which was caused by fears of credit deterioration and unexpected loan losses — KEY stock flashed a bullish quantitative signal. Assuming that the signal maintains its robustness both temporally and magnitude-wise, the regional banking powerhouse could make for an intriguing options play.

For context, all forecasts about the unknown future are necessarily contingent. In other words, nothing about tomorrow can be necessary, only probable. So, contingency by itself isn’t the flaw. Rather, issues start to arise regarding the placement of said contingency.

Under the traditional methodologies of fundamental and technical analysis, the contingency is self-referential. Currently, the way the two disciplines are practiced, both the premise and the conclusion are contingent upon the author’s interpretation. As such, labels such as “undervaluation” or what patterns constitute “breakouts” are arbitrary and are wholly reliant on the author making the claim.

In contrast, the quantitative approach removes the observer from the premise entirely and lets the data determine how outcomes may probabilistically pan out. This is the reason why, when you get your local weather report, you have assurances that no matter what station you watch, the data is the same.

If meteorology were conducted by fundamental or technical analysts, each station might very well have its own weather report, with many of them contradicting each other.

Witnessing A Signal In KEY Stock That Everyone Else Is Blind To

It’s not just the placement of contingency where the quantitative approach differs from fundamental or technical analysis. One of the core advantages of quant methodologies is the objective identification of potentially bullish or bearish signals.

Looking at KEY stock from a fundamental perspective, I would be hard-pressed to find a compelling argument to buy the equity. For example, right now, KEY trades at 22.82-times trailing-year earnings. Roughly at this point last year, the metric was 22.04 times.

What does that mean? I have no idea.

Technical analysis would be even worse. There’s really nothing that would suggest that KEY stock is a bullish idea other than recently, the security “held support” at its 200-day moving average. But earlier, the 200 DMA represented resistance. Therefore, this metric offers contradictory insight — with only one version of perceived reality winning out because the author said so.

The quantitative approach is different. In the past 10 weeks, KEY stock printed a 4-6-D sequence: four up weeks, six down weeks, with an overall downward trajectory. This actually happened so there’s no point in refuting the claim. Now that we have a distinct signal, we can look back at this specific population group to determine if there are behavioral differences that we can profitably exploit.

As a baseline, the projected 10-week median returns form a standard distribution, with prices tending to cluster around $17.80 (assuming a starting point or anchor price of $17.33). However, when juxtaposed with the 4-6-D sequence, the two datapoints form a bimodal distribution — essentially two distinct population groups.

While getting the hands dirty with the math would be well beyond the scope of this article, in terms of density, prices under 4-6-D conditions would be expected to cluster most prominently around $18 to $18.50. At most, we’re talking about a 3.9% improvement in price clustering dynamics.

I wouldn’t necessarily call this an earth-shattering variance and much more research would need to be done to determine its true statistical significance. Still, speculators can use vertical options spreads to exploit this empirical delta that no one else in the public domain is talking about.

Banking On The Final Advantage Of The Quant Model: Specificity

Finally, we can talk about the true advantage of the quant approach: narrowing down specific trading ideas rather than talking about vague zones of favorable valuations and pricing spectrums. Using the available data above, the trade that arguably makes the most sense for aggressive speculators is the 18/19 bull call spread expiring Dec. 19.

Under this setup, you’re using the income received from the short call to partially offset the debit paid of the long call. For the trade to be maximally profitable — where the reward is capped at the $19 strike price — KEY stock must rise through this higher threshold at expiration. That would lead to a payout of over 194% at time of writing.

While this tight spread is very much ambitious, the breakeven price sits at $18.34. Under 4-6-D conditions, that would be considered a realistic target. Admittedly, reaching toward $19 will require some luck. However, if today’s market recovery can continue, it would not be an unreasonable argument.

The opinions and views expressed in this content are those of the individual author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Benzinga. Benzinga is not responsible for the accuracy or reliability of any information provided herein. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be misconstrued as investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Readers are asked not to rely on the opinions or information herein, and encouraged to do their own due diligence before making investing decisions.

Read More:

Image: Shutterstock