Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Celsius Holdings Inc (Symbol: CELH), where a total of 56,808 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 5.7 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 73.5% of CELH’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 7.7 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $70 strike call option expiring October 17, 2025, with 5,238 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 523,800 underlying shares of CELH. Below is a chart showing CELH’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $70 strike highlighted in orange:
Scorpio Tankers Inc (Symbol: STNG) saw options trading volume of 6,791 contracts, representing approximately 679,100 underlying shares or approximately 69% of STNG’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 984,605 shares.
Especially high volume was seen for the $40 strike call option expiring September 19, 2025, with 6,500 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 650,000 underlying shares of STNG. Below is a chart showing STNG’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $40 strike highlighted in orange:
And PayPal Holdings Inc (Symbol: PYPL) saw options trading volume of 66,166 contracts, representing approximately 6.6 million underlying shares or approximately 67.9% of PYPL’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 9.7 million shares.
Especially high volume was seen for the $71 strike call option expiring August 29, 2025, with 5,080 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 508,000 underlying shares of PYPL. Below is a chart showing PYPL’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $71 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for CELH options, STNG options, or PYPL options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
Also see:
XU Videos
BLNG Historical Stock Prices
PS shares outstanding history
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.